Let's connect ↗Bring visual evidence into maintenance and quality decisions. Use a focused visual inspection approach to help teams recognize defects and changes in asset condition.
Asset programs are connecting inspection, condition signals and AI-assisted insight with work management. The difficult handoff is often between finding a problem and getting the right person to act with the right context.
Pragma Edge organizes asset work around See, Listen, Think and Act. We connect asset data, inspection evidence, monitoring and prioritization with planning and field execution, choosing the scope that fits the customer environment.
Start with a representative asset class and a maintenance journey. Validate data quality, agree when an observation warrants action, and review whether the resulting work improves the operating process before expanding coverage.
Inspection images are valuable only when they support a repeatable decision. Camera placement, lighting, image quality and clear acceptance criteria matter as much as the model. Begin with a contained use case where the result can be compared with expert judgment.
Inspection images are valuable only when they support a repeatable decision. Camera placement, lighting, image quality and clear acceptance criteria matter as much as the model. Begin with a contained use case where the result can be compared with expert judgment.
Define the condition, defect or quality issue that matters and how it will be observed.
Associate inspection results with the asset, location and maintenance workflow.
Create an explicit path for people to validate findings and decide what happens next.
Connect inspection evidence, asset identity and agreed defect categories. Validate the review process with maintenance specialists and define when an observation becomes a work request.
Baseline the measures relevant to your engagement, then compare results through implementation and operation.
Inspection images are valuable only when they support a repeatable decision. Camera placement, lighting, image quality and clear acceptance criteria matter as much as the model. Begin with a contained use case where the result can be compared with expert judgment.
Agree what should be detected and what an acceptable image looks like.
Define the condition, defect or quality issue that matters and how it will be observed.
A bounded use case with its owner, inputs and acceptance criteria.
Compare findings with known examples and define review thresholds.
Associate inspection results with the asset, location and maintenance workflow.
A working path with the required context, handoffs and review points.
Route accepted findings to the appropriate work process and capture feedback.
Create an explicit path for people to validate findings and decide what happens next.
A reviewed operating outcome and an explicit improvement backlog.
Build an inspection workflow around IBM Maximo Visual Inspection capabilities. Connect image-based evidence, expert review and the operational response for a defined quality or asset-condition problem.
Read more ↗EXPLOREBring asset health, maintenance history and operating signals together. Help teams prioritize work based on evidence and business criticality.
Read more ↗EXPLOREConnect maintenance decisions to work orders and technician execution. Close the loop with the evidence collected when work is completed.
Read more ↗Bring your business goal. Let’s shape a practical next step.